Archive for February, 2008

February 29, 2008: 12:44 am: AlvaroUncategorized

Brain Health NewsSeveral recent news (including video of our recent panel discussion):

1) Study Finds Improved Cognitive Health among Older Americans (Journal of the Alzheimer's Association)

- "Societal investment in building and maintaining cognitive reserve through formal education in childhood and continued cognitive stimulation during work and leisure in adulthood may help limit the burden of dementia among the growing number of older adults worldwide".

- "Cognitive impairment dropped from 12.2 percent in 1993 to 8.7 percent in 2002 among people 70 and older." 

- "Education and financial status appeared overall to protect against developing cognitive impairment."

- "Further, they suggested, the results support the notion of cognitive reserve, which hypothesizes that the brains of more educated people may be better able to sustain greater damage from Alzheimer's disease or other pathology before clinical signs of impairment appear."

- Link to full study: here.

2)  Our Brain Fitness Panel a few weeks ago touched on implications of the cognitive reserve.

- The video of the entire 1.5 hour panel is now available.

- This post featured the main highlights.

3) Dakim ® , Inc. Secures $10.6 Million Series C Funding Led by Galen Partners. Dan Michel, CEO of Dakim, is one of the panelists you can watch in the panel mentioned above

- "an innovator in brain fitness technology solutions, today announced the completion of a $10.6 million Series C financing. The round was led by Galen Partners, a leading private equity firm specializing in healthcare investing...Mr. Jahns said, “Dakim has developed an innovative, affordable and practical solution to assist the rapidly aging population maintain their brain health and fight Alzheimer’s disease."

Comment: fascinating to see such a large round-which makes sense given demographic trends in this emerging field. But, still, it is a significant bet. Hopefully part of those resources will be devoted to research behind the specific impact of the Dakim cognitive intervention.

4) Scientific Learning Reports 2007 Results: a company that offers cognitive training to K12 students

- "a leading provider of brain fitness solutions for the education market...Revenue for the year totaled $46.1 million, an increase of 12% compared to $41.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006." and "We expanded our addressable market through the acquisition of the Reading Assistant which moves us closer to the mainstream market."

Comment: a very interesting trade-off here. On the one hand, Scientific Learning has great research and clinical evidence for specific groups of kids with specific priorities. Kids with auditory processing as main bottleneck may see clear improvements after their intensive intervention. Other kids may also benefit, but unclear at what point lies the balance between clinical justification and the time & investment required. Companies obviously want to grow and increase "addressable markets". The question is, how can schools best make the decision about what kids may benefit the most? or benefit "enough"?

, , , , , , , , , , ,

February 27, 2008: 4:02 pm: AlvaroUncategorized

brainGiven the current political climate, we are pleased to host this thought-provoking article by 2 of our Expert Contributors. Dear Mr or Mrs Next President: how can you help our minds take better care of our brains?

--------------

Ask Not What The Health System Can Do For You...

-- By Simon J. Evans, PhD and Paul R. Burghardt, PhD.

With the presidential debates gearing up again we are sure to hear more about health care. But we propose a slightly different question. In addition to asking how we can get more people healthcare coverage, we should also ask why so many people are sick in the first place.

The words of John Kennedy might today be, “Ask not what the health care system can do for you. Ask what you can do to reduce the health care burden”. But before delving into what we can do, let’s take a look at some realities that our next president could face in their first ‘State of the Union’ address.

On the downside –

* We are not healthy: 60% of adults and 20% of kids are overweight; 30% of today’s kids are anticipated to become diabetic; 20% of high school kids have early stages of heart disease. The estimated economic burden of depression for the year 2000 (most recent estimate) was $83.1 billion, and this is just one of many brain-related diseases

* We are aging: within the next couple of decades, about 20% of the population will be of retirement age; 4.5 million people already have Alzheimer’s disease and by 2050 there will be 16 million cases.

* We are heavily medicated: anti-depressants are the leading selling drugs in the United States; record numbers of children are on these and anti-psychotics; for adults, cholesterol and blood pressure medicines are becoming as common as breakfast cereal.

On the upside –

* The US government estimates that healthier lifestyles could save $71 billion per year in health care costs and another $14 billion in lost productivity.

* 1 out of 7 deaths are premature and could be avoided with better diets and active lifestyles.

Perhaps the next president should spend a little effort promoting methods to improve these statistics. But how?

We typically think of heart disease, diabetes, depression, and Alzheimer’s dementia as very different problems. But the more we learn about disease, the more we realize that these seemingly different diseases often have a lot in common at the cellular and molecular level. They also have a lot in common when it comes to how they gained a foothold in your brain and body to get started in the first place.

However, we have an arsenal of tools proven to help reduce common cellular damage to maintain fit brains and bodies. What are those tools? Some high tech drugs and medical equipment that is out of reach for much of the population lacking health care insurance? Actually, no. These tools are very low tech and available to everyone. They are:

1. Eating a quality diet

2. Getting regular physical activity

3. Keeping your mind active and engaged

4. Getting enough sleep and rest

Sounds easy, right? So why don’t we all do it, and why didn’t we have all of these problems 50 and 100 years ago?

First of all, in yesteryear a breakfast muffin contained about 150 calories. Today that muffin is 400 calories. A large drink at the soda fountain totaled 12 ounces. Today, that drink is the smallest size on most menus. Yes, we are suffering from proportion distortion. We love to eat, and it ain’t peas and carrots we are a cravin’.

Second, for many people going to work actually meant going to work, physically. Today, the extent of our office exercise is finger aerobics on our QWERTY keyboards. Physical activity used to be a regular part of everyday life, not a chore that you have to schedule into your day.

Third, as Alvaro pointed out on a recent article, many of us ‘outsource our brains’ and no longer think for ourselves. With mass media messages, GPS systems, calculators, spell checkers and electronic organizers, we must ask the question how well we could function without them. I know I am guilty of this one, myself.

Finally, we are staying up later and getting up earlier to meet those deadlines. On average, we get 1.5 hours less zzzzzs than we did about 100 years ago. Not only that but we spend far more time busy, busy, busy when we are awake than we ever used to.

Now, change happens. We shouldn’t expect to always do things the way we used to, and we’re not suggesting that. Food, in all its irresistible varieties, is much more available. Are we supposed to just not eat it. Well, uh, it wouldn’t hurt to pass on the second helping of triple chocolate cheesecake now and then.

And no, we can’t jog around our office but we can do simple things to introduce more activity into our day. Walk instead of drive those 1-mile errands. Park further from the door, take the stairs . . . you’ve heard all this before. So why don’t we do it?

One reason is that no one likes to be told what to do and subjected to some guilt trip, most people just don’t respond to that. Also, most people haven’t really thought about what they really want their health to look like or developed a reasonable plan to reach their health-goals. As the old adage says, “If you don’t know where you are going, you are sure to get there”, plus it helps to have a map. Finally, even with a plan many folks will give up after the first sign of failure or fatigue. These changes don’t become easy until we make them an integral part of our lives.

So how do you motivate people to take action to maintain their health? Since everyone is different, many options exist. The obvious answer, that will motivate the most people, is money, money, money . . . money (did you hear ‘The Apprentice’ theme song).

At a policy level, it would be exceptionally helpful if the next president worked to create incentives for healthy lifestyles and behaviors. Now, I know this is easy to say, probably not as easy to do (and keep everyone happy), but you have to walk before you run. What if the next presidential administration actually incentivized (is that a word yet?) us to take better care of ourselves? What if health insurance companies gave discounts to people that tried to live a healthy lifestyle?

What if the government gave us tax breaks to eat healthier food and exercise? What if each individual had one government subsidized continuing education, or self-enrichment class each year? Would this reduce the overall health care burden for employers and make it more affordable to cover more people? Help reduce sick days and increase productivity and creativity? Hmmm….

We realize there are many caveats to implementing such a plan but something has to be done and maybe some bright politician can figure out how to do it. Who would lose if the country were to improve their health?

Insurance companies wouldn’t have to fork out as much. Medical providers would be able to divert more of their attention to preventing disease, instead of managing chronic illness. The government wouldn’t be in such a hot seat for the health care crisis. Big Pharma might sell fewer drugs, but there are several new health-related industries that they have the expertise to tap into. Basically, we would all win.

So back to our initial question: “Why are we so sick in the first place?” If you step back and see the forest for the trees, our world has changed drastically in the last 50 to 100 years. With technology, and the availability it brings, we may have become a little complacent, a little too trusting that the magic cure-all pill is there for us.

It is true that we are living longer. But I’m sure with increased longevity, everyone would want at least a reasonable quality of life and currently that isn’t the status quo. So the answer to our question seems to be….lifestyle choices. Making the best lifestyle choices, and maintaining them, isn’t always easy but the best things in life rarely are.

So Madam or Mister President, will you help us help ourselves?

Simon Evans Brain fit for life-- This Paul Burghardt Brain Fit for lifearticle was co-written by Simon Evans and Paul Burghardt. Drs. Evans and Burghardt currently collaborate in the University of Michigan’s Department of Psychiatry, and the Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute to study the effects of nutrition and exercise on brain function. They host the Brain Fit for Life blog and are collaborating on an upcoming book on the subject.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

February 26, 2008: 12:52 pm: AlvaroUncategorized

MRI scan neuroimagingDo you want to change your brain? (for the better, we all hope!). Keep reading Dr. Pascale Michelon's blog post...

---------------

You may have heard that the brain is plastic. As you know the brain is not made of plastic! Neuroplasticity or brain plasticity refers to the brain’s ability to CHANGE throughout life. The brain has the amazing ability to reorganize itself by forming new connections between brain cells (neurons).

In addition to genetic factors, the environment in which a person lives, as well as the actions of that person, play a role in plasticity.

Neuroplasticity occurs in the brain:

1- At the beginning of life: when the immature brain organizes itself.

2- In case of brain injury: to compensate for lost functions or maximize remaining functions.

3- Through adulthood: whenever something new is learned and memorized

Plasticity and brain injury

A surprising consequence of neuroplasticity is that the brain activity associated with a given function can move to a different location as a consequence of normal experience, brain damage or recovery.

In his book “The Brain That Changes Itself: Stories of Personal Triumph from the Frontiers of Brain Science”, Norman Doidge describes numerous examples of functional shifts.

In one of them, a surgeon in his 50s suffers a stroke. His left arm is paralyzed. During his rehabilitation, his good arm and hand are immobilized, and he is set to cleaning tables. The task is at first impossible. Then slowly the bad arm remembers how too move. He learns to write again, to play tennis again: the functions of the brain areas killed in the stroke have transferred themselves to healthy regions!

The brain compensates for damage by reorganizing and forming new connections between intact neurons. In order to reconnect, the neurons need to be stimulated through activity.

Plasticity, learning and memory

For a long time, it was believed that as we aged, the connections in the brain became fixed. Research has shown that in fact the brain never stops changing through learning. Plasticity IS the capacity of the brain to change with learning. Changes associated with learning occur mostly at the level of the connections between neurons. New connections can form and the internal structure of the existing synapses can change.

Did you know that when you become an expert in a specific domain, the areas in your brain that deal with this type of skill will grow?

For instance, London taxi drivers have a larger hippocampus (in the posterior region) than London bus drivers (Maguire, Woollett, & Spiers, 2006)…. Why is that? It is because this region of the hippocampus is specialized in acquiring and using complex spatial information in order to navigate efficiently. Taxi drivers have to navigate around London whereas bus drivers follow a limited set of routes.

Plasticity can also be observed in the brains of bilinguals (Mechelli et al., 2004). It looks like learning a second language is possible through functional changes in the brain: the left inferior parietal cortex is larger in bilingual brains than in monolingual brains.

Plastic changes also occur in musicians brains compared to non-musicians. Gaser and Schlaug (2003) compared professional musicians (who practice at least 1hour per day) to amateur musicians and non-musicians. They found that gray matter (cortex) volume was highest in professional musicians, intermediate in amateur musicians, and lowest in non-musicians in several brain areas involved in playing music: motor regions, anterior superior parietal areas and inferior temporal areas.

Finally, Draganski and colleagues (2006) recently showed that extensive learning of abstract information can also trigger some plastic changes in the brain. They imaged the brains of German medical students 3 months before their medical exam and right after the exam and compared them to brains of students who were not studying for exam at this time. Medical students’ brains showed learning-induced changes in regions of the parietal cortex as well as in the posterior hippocampus. These regions of the brains are known to be involved in memory retrieval and learning.

Plasticity and brain exercises

You know that exercising or stimulating your brain is highly recommended as part of a brain-healthy lifestyle. You may have wondered why? What is the reasoning behind the “use it or lose it” idea? Brain exercises have an impact on brain health thanks to the brain’s plasticity. When you exercise or stimulate your brain through new or merely unfamiliar activities, you can trigger changes in the brain, such as an increase of connections between neurons. These changes contribute to an increase in what is called your brain reserve. Research suggests that the more brain reserve, the more resistant the brain is to age-related or disease-related damages.

 

 

Pascale Michelon--- This article was written by Pascale Michelon, Ph. D., for SharpBrains.com. Dr. Michelon has a Ph.D. in Cognitive Psychology and has worked as a Research Scientist at Washington University in Saint Louis, in the Psychology Department. She conducted several research projects to understand how the brain makes use of visual information and memorizes facts. She is now an Adjunct Faculty at Washington University, and teaches Memory Workshops in numerous retirement communities in the St Louis area.

 

---------------

If you are interested in learning more:

- Recommended Books on Brain and Mind

- Build Your Cognitive Reserve, an Interview with Yaakov Stern

- The Art of Changing the Brain, an Interview with James Zull

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

February 25, 2008: 1:39 am: AlvaroUncategorized

(Note: neurofeedback is a form of biofeedback that measures brain waves and that, according to practitioners, provides good "brain training" for specific clinical conditions).
A few weeks ago Dr. David Rabiner wrote a great post on How Strong is the Research Support for Neurofeedback in Attention Deficits?, concluding that

- "It is for these reasons that neurofeedback is understandably regarded as an unproven treatment approach for ADHD at this time by many ADHD researchers.

- However, these studies do provide a solid basis for suggesting that if parents choose to pursue neurofeedback for their child, there is a reasonable chance that their child will benefit even though we can't be sure that it is the specific EEG training that is responsible for the benefits. Thus, although the efficacy of neurofeedback has yet to be conclusively confirmed in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, it is important to place this limitation in the context of the supportive research evidence that has been accumulated.

- Providing this context can help families better understand the strengths and limitations of the existing research on neurofeedback and enable them to make a better informed decision about whether to consider this treatment option for their child."

This post prompted several good comments, one of which is reproduced below in its entirety, since it adds an interesting perspective.
Bernard writes: My wife tried EEG neurofeedback over 10 years ago in the hopes of normalizing her brain functioning to overcome lifelong epilepsy. She had a history of multiple, daily absence seizures and grand mal (tonic clonic) seizures once every two years.

After 3 and a half months of twice weekly sessions, we almost gave up on the neurofeedback. It was burning a hole in our wallet (no insurance covered it) and we were not seeing any results. However, we stuck with it (mostly because my wife refused to poison her liver with anti-epileptic drugs).

After 5 months, it was like someone had turned a switch. She stopped having seizures, was calmer, had better memory and cognitive functioning (thinking clearer). We stopped the neurofeedback sessions and she went 4 years without a single seizure event and likely would still be completely seizure free today we had not started a family (her TC seizure activity returned, but not the absence seizures, and got progressively worse with each pregnancy - but that's a different story).

After our experience, I did as much digging as I could about EEG neurofeedback (see http://www.coping-with-epilepsy.com/forums/f22/eeg-neurofeedback-501/ ) and I'm really outraged that the medical industry continues to "poo-poo" the resounding body of evidence for it.

Snippets from my findings:"Randomized double blind placebo controlled clinical trials (RCT) are the current “gold standard” for demonstrating clinical efficacy of new drugs or therapies. It is very difficult for new therapeutic interventions to gain broad acceptance in the absence of such trials. Recent events have raised serious questions about the conditions under which placebo (sham) controls can be used. The international standards published by the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) prohibit placebo-controlled studies when known effective treatments exist. Additionally, there is new interest in identifying the mechanisms underlying the placebo response, which may challenge the “placebo” as a legitimate control condition. Both of these events should be of considerable interest to those interested in clinical psychophysiology in general and neurotherapy in particular. "

"Recent New England Journal of Medicine reviews of research design have cast doubt on the need for placebo controlled designs. Their review has shown that when there is a preponderance of case series reports, the concordance between those results and those of the "gold standard" (double blind placebo controlled studies) was very high. Many in the field are now arguing against doing a double blind study due to the lack of proper humane treatment of those in the control group (receiving no treatment), an approach which is also now considered unethical by the World Health Organization when known treatments exist."

"Since the first single-case study, reported over 30 years ago (Sterman & Friar, 1972), a fair number of controlled clinical studies, stemming from many different laboratories, have produced consistent data on the efficacy of SMR training in epileptic patients. It is particularly noteworthy that these results have been achieved in an extremely difficult subgroup of epilepsy patients, those with poorly controlled seizures who had proven unresponsive to pharmacological treatment. We will here provide only a cursory overview of this clinical research literature. For a more detailed treatment the interested reader is referred to Sterman (2000), while other recent summaries have also been provided by Monderer et al. (2002), and Walker and Kozlowski (2005).

...
In reviewing the data accumulated in these studies, Sterman (2000) found that 82% of 174 participating patients who were otherwise not controlled had shown significantly improved seizure control (defined as a minimum of 50% reduction in seizure incidence), with around 5% of these cases reporting a complete lack of seizures for up to 1 year subsequent to training cessation. ..."

Because of the problems with designing a gold standard study, the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback (AAPB) has developed their own rating scale for measuring efficacy of neurofeedback for a given condition:

Rating explanation:
http://www.aapb.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3336

Conditions with ratings:
http://www.aapb.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3327

What really gets my goat is that EEG neurofeedback has been studied now since the 60s - almost 50 years and there have been no reports of iatrogenesis (a harmful effect produced by the healer or the healing process): "Fortunately, adverse reactions to biofeedback training are overall rare, and when they occur they are relatively transient or readily dealt with by competent practitioners (Hammond, 2001; Schwartz & Schwartz, 1995)."

So here we have a treatment option that has been studied for over 50 years, has no negative/side/adverse effects, has tons of evidence supporting it's efficacy, but doesn't have a single commercial entity that "owns" it in the same way that drug companies and medical device companies own their solutions. No company is pushing for FDA approval - or studies - or marketing it, because it's not cost effective for them.

Cyberonics was able to get FDA approval, acceptance by the neurology industry and insurance coverage for their VNS medical device for epilepsy with studies showing more dubious efficacy than EEG neurofeedback and with well established, potentially serious adverse risks. It truly infuriates me to see how the commercial aspect of the medical industry drives options for patient choice in treatments.

----------------------

(Note:  I will now bring the few comments that followed, so it is easier to continue the conversation here).

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

February 23, 2008: 1:57 pm: AlvaroUncategorized

A CDC report estimated that, in 2003, 4.4 million youth ages 4-17 lived with diagnosed ADHD, and 2.5 million of them were receiving medication treatment. Now, which is the core deficit underlying ADHD-so that treatments really address it? and how are ADHD and brain development related? Keep reading...

ADHD & the Nature of Self-Control - Revisiting Barkley's Theory of ADHD

--- By David Rabiner, Ph.D

As implied in the title of his book, ADHD and the Nature of Self-Control, Dr. Barkley argues that the fundamental deficit in individuals with ADHD is one of self-control, and that problems with attention are a secondary characteristic of the disorder.

Dr. Barkley emphasizes that during the course of development, control over a child's behavior gradually shifts from external sources to being increasingly governed by internal rules and standards. Controlling one's behavior by internal rules and standards is what is meant by the term "self-control".

For example, young children have very little ability to refrain from acting on an impulse - i.e. to "inhibit" their behavior. Instead, it is more typical for a young child to "act out" the things that pop into his or her mind. In addition, when a young child is able to refrain from acting on impulse, it is often because something in the immediate surroundings keeps them from doing so. For example, the child may refrain from throwing a toy when frustrated because his mother is present, and he knows he will be punished if he throws it.

This is different from an older child who may also have the impulse to smash a toy, but who does not act on this impulse because he/she can anticipate the following consequences:

1. He won't have the toy to play with later on;

2. His parents would be upset if he broke his new toy;

3. He would be upset for letting down his parents;

4. He would be upset because he let his temper get out of control - he let himself down;

In this example, the child has learned to "inhibit" and regulate their behavior based on internal controls and guidelines, rather than requiring the immediate threat of external consequences.

- Self-Regulation as the Core Deficit in ADHD -

Dr. Barkley argues that the critical deficit associated with ADHD is the failure to develop this capacity for "self-control", also referred to as "self-regulation". He suggests that this results primarily for biological reasons, and not because of parenting.

As a result of this core deficit in self-regulation, specific and important psychological processes and functions subsequently fail to develop in an optimal way. These include the following:

* Working Memory, which refers to the ability to recall past events and manipulate them in one's mind so as to be able to make predictions about the future. This is an important part of dealing effectively with day-to-day situations that Barkley feels is diminished in individuals with ADHD. In fact, recent research has document a deficit in working memory in individuals with ADHD.

* Internalization of Speech, which refers to the ability to use internally generated speech to guide one's behavior and actions. Think about how often you use internal speech - i.e., talking to yourself, to help regulate and guide your behavior and to solve problems you may be confronting. Dr Barkley argues that this capacity develops later and less completely in individuals with ADHD.

* Sense of Time, which refers to the ability to keep track of the passage of time and to change/alter one's behavior in relation to time. Consider how often one needs to evaluate the time required to accomplish a particular task and how the time you are devoting to a particular task compares to what is available, and what will be required for other tasks. Dr. Barkley suggests that for individuals with ADHD, the psychological sense of time is impaired, which prevents them from being able to modify/alter their behavior in response to real world time demands. This is seen, for example, in the adolescent who may become engrossed in a project and wind up spending far more time on it than should have been allocated, given other demands that need to be met.

* Goal Directed Behavior, which refers to the ability to establish a goal in one's mind and use the internal image of that goal to shape, guide, and direct one's actions. This is an incredibly important capacity as it underlies consistent effort and persistence. Imagine how much harder it would be to persevere through difficult and frustrating times if you were not able to hold a long-term goal in your mind. Dr. Barkley argues that individuals with ADHD have great difficulty doing this, and thus have difficulty with making a consistent effort to achieve long-term goals.

- Implications of Considering ADHD a Disorder of Self-regulation -

Conceptualizing ADHD as a disorder of self-regulation, and not a disorder of attention, has significant implications for understanding the difficulties experienced by individuals with ADHD and how to assist them in coping more effectively with those difficulties. Below is a brief summary of Dr. Barkley's views on this.

First, he argues that individuals with ADHD may not lack the skills and knowledge to be successful, but rather, their problems with self-regulation often prevent them from applying their knowledge and skills at the necessary times. As Dr. Barkley puts it, "ADHD is more a problem of doing what one knows rather than knowing what to do."

For example, although a child with ADHD may "know" that sharing and cooperating are an important part of making and keeping friends, he may fail to apply this knowledge with peers because the immediate rewards associated with getting one's way overpowers the less salient goal of keeping a friendship. Or, the child may know the steps to follow to do a good job on a school project, but not act on this knowledge because of problems with managing time and using a long-term goal to guide behavior.

The treatment implication that follows from this conceptualization is that treatment should focus on helping individuals apply the knowledge they already have at the appropriate times, rather than on teaching specific knowledge and skills. This will require frequent external cues and reminders to apply this knowledge, because their internal guides for behavior are less effective.

For example, consider the child who does not share and cooperate because the immediate payoff of getting what he wants is more salient than the long-term consequences this behavior has for his friendships. Dr. Barkley would argue that this child may not need to be taught "social skills", as he already knows the right thing to do. Instead, he needs to be provided with frequent reminders about how to behave during actual peer interactions. This could take the form of having the child review a short set of "social rules" immediately before a playtime with peers, as well as reminding the child of these rules at regular intervals during the playtime.

In regards to following classroom rules and getting work done, Dr. Barkley also emphasizes the need to provide external prompts. Writing rules down on signs around the classroom is one way to do this. Posting class rules on an index card taped to the child's desk is another. During work times, one possibility is to have the child wear headphones and listen to a tape that provides frequent reminders to stay on task, to write neatly, and to check one's work. In all of these examples, the principle is to compensate for the child's inability to control his or her behavior through internal means by providing as many external prompts and reminders as possible.

- The Limitations of External Prompts and why Rewards are Necessary -

Even when external prompts are provided, however, an important limitation is that their effectiveness remains dependent on the child's motivation to follow these rules rather than pursuing alternatives that may be more immediately appealing. Because individuals with ADHD are so attuned to immediate consequences, however, attractive short-term alternatives will often be pursued. To enhance the child's motivation to meet the behavioral expectations that have been set, therefore, he feels it is necessary to provide rewards and privileges for meeting those expectations that are more attractive and appealing than those associated with alternative behaviors the child could engage in.

What can make this difficult to do with children who have ADHD is the immediacy with which rewards may need to be provided. For example, the problem with telling a child with ADHD that having a good week at school will result in a reward on the weekend is that it assumes the child can use the anticipation of this reward to guide their behavior over an entire week. According to Dr. Barkley, however, this is likely to be ineffective because it depends on the type of internalized control of behavior that he believes is deficient to begin with.

To overcome this, he argues that long-term objective must be broken down into numerous shorter-term goals, each of which has its own associated reward. For example, the special weekend treat may need to be supplemented by daily privileges that are contingent on the child's meeting specific behavioral expectations each day. Behavioral expectations for the day may need to be broken down into numerous shorter intervals during the day. Frequent reminders to the child about what those expectations are, and what will be attained by meeting them, may also need to be incorporated. Obviously, this is very difficult to do, and is one reason why implementing an effective behavioral treatment plan for a child with ADHD can be so challenging.

It is important to emphasize, however, that this approach is not equivalent to rewarding the child for simply doing what he should be doing in the first place, as is sometimes argued. As Dr. Barkley notes, "...the required response of others to the poor self-control shown by those with ADHD is not to eliminate the outcomes of their actions and to excuse them from personal accountability. It is to temporally tighten up those consequences, emphasizing more immediate accountability."

In other words, a child with ADHD is not "let off the hook" because of their condition. Instead, one needs to heighten the child's accountability in the form of more frequent checks and feedback on their behavior, supplemented by the provision of appropriate rewards and privileges when desired standards of behavior have been met.

- Why Treatment Needs to be Ongoing and Long-term -

Even when these principles are faithfully applied, recognizing that the behaviors seen in ADHD results from an underlying deficit in self-regulation implies that gains associated with treatment will not persist after treatment is discontinued. Thus, treatment reflects an ongoing effort to manage the child's symptoms rather than "curing" the disorder.

While this may be discouraging, Dr. Barkley also notes that as children with ADHD mature, their diminished capacity for self-regulation will mature as well. Thus, even though they may never fully catch up to their peers in this regard, their ability to guide and govern their behavior via internal means will nonetheless grow and develop. Over time, therefore, an individual's reliance on external sources of motivation will diminish, as will the required intensity and frequency with which these external source are need to be provided. Eventually, the adolescent or young adult with ADHD may learn to provide their own external prompts in the form of lists and other types of cues that prove to be effective, and to provide themselves with their own rewards for meeting their self-imposed standards.

Another treatment implication that follows from Dr. Barkley's model is that medication treatment may be effective because it normalizes, or at least improves, the underlying deficit in behavioral inhibition that he regards as the core feature of ADHD. Dr. Barkley reviews evidence for this contention in his book, and argues that medication is the only currently available treatment that has been demonstrated to produce such results. As such, he believes that it should be the predominant treatment approach for individuals with ADHD.

- Summary and Conclusions -

Barkley's theory has been widely recognized as a significant advance in our thinking about ADHD that helps to organize a vast body of literature and clinical observations about the disorder. As with any theory, it's ultimate value will depend on the amount of new research that it stimulates, and the information that is obtained from those studies.

One important point to note is that even if one agress with Barkley's notion that ADHD is fundamentally a deficit of self-regulation, it does not necessarily follow that the interventions he advocates - basically, behavior therapy and medication treatment - are the only approaches to be pursued. Clearly, these are the interventions that currently enjoy the strongest empirical support. They are limited, however, in that neither is conceptualized as resulting in any enduring change in the child. External prompts and the provision of rewards are intended to compensate for the child's deficits rather than correct them and medication provides a short-term improvement in those deficits that vanishes when it has cleared the child's system.

What about the possibility of interventions that may result in more enduring changes in the child? The capacity for self-regulation and the other executive functions (e.g., working memory) that Barkley describes are ultimately the outcomes of aspects of brain functioning. Given what we know about the plasticity of the nervous system, especially at younger ages, is it possible that children with ADHD could be provided with specific cognitive training exercises and experience that might result in more enduring changes in their functioning?

In the field of ADHD, this is the proverbial $64,000 question. There are, in fact, intriguing hints that this may be possible. For example, recent research has demonstrated that computerized training of working memory skills is associated with a decrease in ADHD symptoms and that this benefit persists beyond the duration of the training itself. (Disclosure - Working Memory Training is the program marketed by Cogmed, a sponsor of Attention Research Update). There have also been a number of studies of neurofeedback - a treatment approach that attempts to teach individuals to alter and control basic aspects of brain functioning - in which more enduring changes in the child have been reported. Many researchers, however, continue to raise questions about the adequacy of these studies and point to the need for well-controlled trials.

In this regard, it is encouraging to note that the pace of research on new interventions for ADHD has picked up considerably in recent years and that a number of additional studies of working memory training, neurofeedback, and other attention training approaches are currently underway. I look forward to updating you on the results of these important studies as they are published.

David Rabiner--- Dr. David Rabiner is a child clinical psychologist and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience at Duke University. His research focuses on various issues related to ADHD, the impact of attention problems on academic achievement, and attention training. He also publishes Attention Research Update, a complimentary online newsletter that helps parents, professionals, and educators keep up with the latest research on ADHD.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

February 21, 2008: 11:24 pm: AlvaroUncategorized

Physical fitness. Cognitive/ brain fitness. Both require novelty, variety and challenge. Professor Schlomo Breznitz, a scientific and business leader in the cognitive fitness field, explains why, eloquently, below. Perhaps "we want change" really means "we need change". Enjoy!

------------------------

Why are everyday life challenges not sufficient to keep our brains fit?

-- By Prof. Shlomo Breznitz

Often, when describing the benefits of MindFit to brain health, I am asked by people in the audience whether this software is really needed. After all, so they argue, life provides continues cognitive challenges, which should suffice for ensuring brain fitness. From the moment we wake up until we go to sleep our brains have to attend to complex stimuli, plan many activities, some of them quite complex, and carry us through whatever the day offers. These tasks should provide sufficient "brain exercise" without the need to engage in specific mental workout.

This line of argument sounds oddly familiar, since it is an exact duplication of claims made in the recent past against the need for physical exercise. One jumps into the car and from the car and perhaps even climbs a few stairs before sitting in the chair, which should be enough to burn the calories and keep fit.

It took us a few long years to realize that the movements called for by ordinary everyday life tasks are far from sufficient to keep us physically fit and unless we engage in deliberate workout we are bound to gain weight and suffer the consequences. The balance sheet in this case is quite simple; even a superficial comparison to the activities of people with less sedentary lifestyles indicates that we are not moving enough. By contrast to our forefathers who lived as hunters-gatherers (and this is the most valid comparison since we are physically the same) we are practically immobilized by comforts.

Like in the case of physical fitness, cognitive fitness requires deliberate exercising. The main reason for this rests on the fact that our brains are basically lazy. There are in principle two very different modes of activity that our brains engage in whenever faced with a problem:

a) Analysis of the situation and of the possible alternative actions and their consequences. This mode requires significant resources of attention, takes time and is mentally effortful.

b) Alternatively, we can search for similar experiences in the past and evoke a similar solution. This mode does not require attention, is very fast and automatic. Furthermore, searching one's database for prior experience is easy and there is little or no mental effort involved.

It should come as no surprise, therefore, that the brain prefers by far the automatic mode to the effortful one whenever possible. This has many obvious advantages, as well as some disadvantages. Chief among them is the danger that the degree of similarity between past experience and the present problem would be sacrificed for reasons of convenience. This can lead to neglect of important situational features that render the old, familiar solution, inadequate.

This preference and reliance on experiential precedents feeds directly into our tendency to develop routines. After doing something a few times the activity, any activity, becomes gradually a routine one, requiring less attention and less effort. There are many things we do well precisely due to their becoming increasingly more automatic in terms of the cognitive work involved. Driving is a particularly familiar example. Safe driving requires on the average two years of driving experience, during which time the brain develops helpful routines to deal with familiar challenges on the road. However, the tendency to develop routines is by no means relevant exclusively to motor activities.

Thus, word recognition in reading becomes automatic and allows us to attend to meaning rather than the process of decoding each word from its constituent letters and syllables. As we gain experience, even highly complex intellectual activities become routine over time.

Routines make things easier, but for that same reason they become less challenging. Thus, as we go about the tasks of living we become more experienced and those very tasks lose their ability to challenge our brains. Moreover, old people have too much experience. They have seen almost everything, heard almost everything and faced most situations in the past. It is for this reason that everyday life experiences cannot ensure brain fitness any more than they can assure physical fitness. The analogy does not stop here and just as we need physical workout we need cognitive workouts as well.

The above analysis points to activities holding the greatest promise of healthy challenge to the brain. Namely, they have to be novel. Reading a new book, visiting new places, trying new foods, learning to play a musical instrument, or best, learning a new language, these are the activities that brain fitness is made of. And on top of it, engage in quality cognitive training exercises that cover the broad spectrum of cognitive skills and maximize the cognitive value per unit of time spent.

Schlomo Breznitz CogniFit-- Prof. Schlomo Breznitz is the Founder and President of CogniFit. Previously, he served as the Lady Davis Professor of Psychology and the founding director of the Center for Study of Psychological Stress at the University of Haifa. He has also been visiting professor at the London School of Economics, Berkeley, Stanford, and National Institutes of Health.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

: 6:38 pm: AlvaroUncategorized

Two interesting company press releases, one yesterday one today, showing how cognitive interventions may be helpful no matter our age, from kids to seniors, as long as we understand what those "tools" are supposed to do and don't expect, or are promised, miracles:

Dakim ® , Inc. Secures $10.6 Million Series C Funding Led by Galen Partners

- "an innovator in brain fitness technology solutions, today announced the completion of a $10.6 million Series C financing. The round was led by Galen Partners, a leading private equity firm specializing in healthcare investing...Mr. Jahns said, Dakim has developed an innovative, affordable and practical solution to assist the rapidly aging population maintain their brain health and fight Alzheimers disease."

Comment: fascinating to see such a large round-which makes sense given demographic trends in this emerging field. But, still, it is a significant bet. Hopefully part of those resources will be devoted to research behind the specific impact of the Dakim cognitive intervention.

Scientific Learning Reports 2007 Results

- "a leading provider of brain fitness solutions for the education market...Revenue for the year totaled $46.1 million, an increase of 12% compared to $41.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006." and "We expanded our addressable market through the acquisition of the Reading Assistant which moves us closer to the mainstream market."

Comment: a very interesting trade-off here. On the one hand, Scientific Learning has great research and clinical evidence for specific groups of kids with specific priorities. Kids with auditory processing as main bottleneck may see clear improvements after their intensive intervention. Other kids may also benefit, but unclear at what point lies the balance between clinical justification and the time & investment required. Companies obviously want to grow and increase "addressable markets". The question is, how can schools best make the decision about what kids may benefit the most? or benefit "enough"?

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

: 4:21 pm: Cognitive Psychology Arena - New TitlesUncategorized

Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition

  • Edited by Peter Robinson, Nick C. Ellis

This cutting-edge volume describes the implications of Cognitive Linguistics for the study of second language acquisition (SLA). Chapters in the first two sections identify theoretical and empirical strands of Cognitive Linguistics, presenting them as a coherent whole. Chapters in the third section discuss the relevance of Cognitive Linguistics to SLA and define a research agenda linking these fields with implications for language instruction. Its comprehensive range and tutorial-style chapters make this Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition a valuable resource for students and researchers alike.

ISBN: 9780805853513

Published February 21 2008 by Routledge.

: 12:49 am: AlvaroUncategorized

Cognitive training (the basis for what we call "brain fitness" these days) has a wide array of applications. The most recentneurons one, which is capturing public's imagination, monopolizing media coverage, and creating certain confusion, is Healthy Brain Aging. We are fortunate to have Dr. Joshua Steinerman, one of our new Expert Contributors, offer today his great voice to this conversation. Enjoy!
---------------------------

Minding the Aging Brain

-- By Joshua R. Steinerman, M.D.

Scientists, philosophers, artists, and experts from all fields of human endeavor lament: it ain’t easy getting older. It? Do they refer to frailty and disability? To bodily disease? To life at its essence?

It’s all in your head

The mind is not set in stone, but it is encased by bone. It’s really all about the brain, the hyphen in the mind-body conundrum. That squishy gray neuronal jungle is the interface between internal life and environmental sensations and stimulation. As expected, the brain shows signs of aging just as a wrinkled brow, a stooped posture, or an arthritic finger might. The most common brain changes observed in aging and in age-associated neuropsychiatric disease include:

• Brain atrophy (shrinking may be generalized or more pronounced in a particular lobe or brain structure, such as the hippocampus)

• White matter changes (degradation of the connections between brain regions, often attributed to diseased cerebral blood vessels)

• Plaques and tangles (accumulations of proteins and degenerated bits of nerve cells)

Going out of your mind?

There is no doubt that brain aging takes a toll on cognition and mental performance. Individuals vary in their ability to tolerate age-related brain changes before manifesting overt symptoms (see Alvaro’s interview with Yaakov Stern on the Cognitive Reserve). Nevertheless, there will always be a threshold beyond which signs of deterioration can be perceived. Often, the effects of brain aging are subtle and undetected. The cognitive declines commonly associated with aging are observed in the following domains:

• Processing speed and reaction times

• Cognitive control and Executive function

• Memory

Some brains manifest accelerated or disproportionate changes. These are signs of pathological brain aging, and may take on the form or pattern of particular neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease. Concurrent brain pathologies, such as stroke or Parkinson’s-related changes, may act additively or synergistically. In these settings, cognitive symptoms may include profound memory loss and executive dysfunction, as well as language and visuospatial dysfunction. Behavioral symptoms can include depression, anxiety, apathy, agitation, or psychosis. When the ability to function independently is compromised, the term dementia may be used to describe this frightening mental state.

Getting into your brain

How do you think about your mind? Get cerebral and consider the possibility of successful cognitive aging. How do people envision such a prospect? A recent poll on Brain Health by the American Society on Aging/ Metlife Foundation reported the most common responses offered by Americans when asked to define brain fitness:

• Being alert/sharp

• Keeping your brain active/exercising the brain

• Good mental health/not senile

• Good memory

• Ability to function normally

• Ability to think clearly

• Not suffering from Alzheimer’s Disease

While these are all worthy goals, some cannot be empirically assessed. For example, with expertise, memory can be formally quantified, and Alzheimer’s Disease can be diagnosed with reasonable confidence. On the other hand: being alert, sharp, active, and thinking clearly are not only difficult to measure, they are closely coupled with self-perception and well-being. Such mental phenomena are not only of outstanding everyday relevance, they are sorely under-researched. Consequently, the scientific community may not have the necessary tools to study brain fitness interventions designed to achieve successful cognitive aging.

Brain training isn’t easy, either

In our initial forays into studying science-based cognitive training interventions, I propose that we have yet to apply the outcome measures of greatest interest. I believe there is a need to define and implement novel research outcomes for brain fitness research. These should be functionally-relevant, in that they reflect useful, everyday skills. They should be biologically-relevant, in that they track and distinguish normal and pathological brain aging. Many could be grounded in the largely-unexplored concept of positive cognition, much the way positive psychology energized a vision and research agenda for emotion and character.

Whether or not science-based mental fitness will make promoting brain longevity possible, it surely will not be easy. Establishing efficacy of the emerging technologies and techniques will require tremendous effort and investment. Motivating individuals to engage in brain-healthy activities may prove even more challenging than encouraging adoption of heart-healthy lifestyles. Ignorance will not yield bliss, and mental passivity can destroy. The challenge of minding—and mending—the aging brain must now be addressed head-on.

-- Joshua Steinerman wrote this article for SharpBrains. Dr. Steinerman is a Postdoctoral Clinical Fellow in the Department of Neurology at Columbia University Medical Center. He is a Co-investigator on this Cognitive Training Clinical Trial, and looking for participants who are healthy adults between the ages of 60 and 75 living in New York City.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

February 20, 2008: 11:00 pm: AlvaroUncategorized

A couple of excellent collections of blog posts:

-The Tangled Bank: all things science, with a very clear presentation.

-Medicine 2.0: intersection of Health and Web 2.0, hosted by Bertalan Mesko, its creator.

, , , , ,

February 19, 2008: 6:00 pm: AlvaroUncategorized

Dear Mr or Mrs Next US President,

Thank you for stopping during recess for a quick study sessiMeditation School Studentson. 35 educators have collaborated to present this Carnival of Education as a useful lesson plan for you and your education policy team on what our real concerns and suggestions are.

In case this is your first visit to our SharpBrains blog, let me first of all point out some useful resources to stay sane during the rest of the campaign: selected Brain Teasers, a list of 21 great Brain Books, over a dozen interviews with leading scientists on learning and brain-based topics, and more.

Without further ado, let's proceed to the issues raised. We hope they provide, at the very least, good mental stimulation for you and your advisors.

Education as a System

(Jeff at Eduwonkette).

4. Swimming is good, but I'd rather surf (Nancy at Teacher in a Strange Land).

5. Insurgents fighting the Dark Side (the Status Quo) (Norm at Education Notes Online).



Learning and Teaching Philosophy

6. The First Step (for Academic Success) Is Failure (Joanne at SharpBrains).

7. 1777? (Joanne Jacobs).

8. Maybe we should revisit what is the purpose of education? (Mike at Dangerously Irrelevant).

9. Who needs a college degree? (Jacob at Early Retirement Extreme).

10. Are Schools (Cognitively) Nutritive for Children's Complex Thinking? (Tom and Christine at SharpBrains).

11. May our teaching be too successful for our own good? (Laureen at The Life without School).


From educator to educator

12. Should there be a limit to sharing best practices? (Ms Cornelius at A Shrewdness of Apes).

13. Do you manage stress well? (Gregory at SharpBrains).

14. Where in the world are my union leaders? (Woodlass at Under Assault: Teaching in NYC).

15. Is homework working? (Summer at Mom Is Teaching).

16. What is the education value of Yale's Sex Week? (Dana at Principled Discovery).

17. What makes a good educator? (Carol at Bellringers).

18. How do we survive tough schools? (Andrew at Scenes From The Battleground).

Technology

19. Give me more of it, please! (Pat at Successful Teaching).

20. Enough. Have you heard of Gizmo High? (Matt at Going to the Mat).

21. Using technology in the Classroom 101 (Matthew at In Practice).

22. How can we integrate video in the classroom? (Matthew at Creating Lifelong Learners).

23. Anything beyond Junior Achievement? (Adam at Ipex).

24. Creating a Photography-rich book (Bogusia at Nucleus Learning)

25. How to create online content ( Larry Ferlazzo).

Kids and kids

26. Help: how do I deal with kids who misbehave? (Mike at Education in Texas).

27. Help: what do we do with the profoundly gifted? (The "More" Child).

28. Why do we accept unhelpful labeling of kids? (Marcella at abyss2hope).

29. What is the role of nutrition? (Jackson at Alternative Channel).

30. Can we educate about Darfur? (Bill at The Tempered Radical).

Enrichment Opportunities

31. Do you play any musical instrument? (Megan, a high schooler, at SharpBrains).Piano musical training

32. How many plays did Shakespeare write? (Gedaly a the Bard Blog).

33. Brain Teaser: Words in your brain! (Pascale at SharpBrains).

34. Please Don't Outsource Your Brain to your Vicepresident, ok? (Alvaro at SharpBrains).

35. After all these years...can't we all just be happy? ( JM at "Lead From The Start").

Dear Mr or Mrs Next US President, we hope you have enjoyed this briefing. If you want to contribute to future Carnivals of Education, you can use this simple submission form.

Enjoy the year,

35 education bloggers

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

February 18, 2008: 3:01 pm: AlvaroUncategorized

Dear Mr or Mrs Next US President,

We are glad to welcome you to our blog carnival. After a short hiatus, Encephalon is backScience Debate 2008 and gathering steam. We have prepared this "revival" edition just for you, so you can be well informed and impress us all during the upcoming Sciencedebate 2008.

Without further ado, let's proceed to the questions posed by 23 bloggers on neuroscience and psychology issues. We hope they provide, at the very least, good mental stimulation for you and your advisors.

Big Questions

Do I deserve to vote even if I don't have Free Will? (Marc at Neuroscientifically Challenged).

If culture sculpts our brains, what can our brains do to refine our culture first? (Stephanie at Brains On Purpose).

Is God more than a flying brain? (Jessica at bioephemera).

Is Your brain really reading This? (Pete at Brain Hammer).

A Few Intrusive Questions

Do you play any musical instrument? (Megan at SharpBrains).

What exactly is your field of expertise? what will your brain focus on? (Dave at Cognitive Daily).

Are your voter conditioning efforts paying off so far? (Jake at Pure Pedantry).

Can you generate new solutions to existing problems? (Pascale at SharpBrains).

 

Would you mind if we classify your face? (Johan at Phineas Gage Fan Club). 

Emerging Science & Tech

Can we please peak into your brain to make sure you make rational decisions? (coolMRI stuff).

 

Can robots feel emotions? have you asked your Roomba? (Paul at Memoirs of a Postgrad).

How Strong is the research support for Neurofeedback? (David at SharpBrains).

Just FYI-new brain-computer interfaces: the dream of every micromanager (Mo, at Neurophilosopher).

Can driving-related cognitive skills be trained? policy implications? (Alvaro at SharpBrains).

How Science Is Done

May double-blind peer review help women scientists get their share? (Cognition and Language Lab).

How Science Informs Health Policy

One more time: there is no proven link between autism and vaccination, correct? (Kevin at Brain Blogger).

Will the FDA, or another agency, help evaluate this miracle cure for Alzheimer's? or was it for obesity? (Neurocritic).

Does cannabis use affect the brain? (Stephen at Quintessence of Dust).

Can we build More parks to reduce drug abuse? (Sandy at Mouse Trap).

Will we soon have a genetic screen for Parkinson’s susceptibility (Chris at Ouroboros).

Stress, PTSD, Depression

Is PTSD a useful label? (Vaughan at MindHacks).

You manage stress and presure well, don't you? (Gregory at SharpBrains).

Will this become standard depression treatment 20 years from now? (Jill at SharpBrains).

Why have psychology and the CIA have a love-hate affair? (Jeremy at Advances in the History of Psychology).

Dear Mr or Mrs Next US President, we hope you have enjoyed this briefing. If you want to keep reading future Encephalon editions, simply consult the new